(So just FYI this one
got kinda babble-y. I think it’s still good, just a bit meandering. If I were a
better writer, I would edit it down before presenting it to you. But I’m a part-time
blogger who does this for cheap therapy and has very little self-respect, so I’m
just shoving it out there as-is. I still hope you enjoy.)
In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been doing something that I normally don’t do; thinking a lot about Flat Earthers and Anti-Vaxxers. And not just thinking about them, but actually trying to understand them. (I know, I know. Hear me out.)
When I’m working, I keep a steady background hum of familiar YouTube videos. Because I am the particular mix of nerdiness and eccentricity that I am, for me that means that Crazy Ex-Girlfriend songs, leftist Youtube talking heads, cinema criticism, and a capella songs are on a pretty steady rotation. So Philosophy Tube’s “Flat Earth OR Why Do People Reject Science?” and Hbomberguy’s “Flat Earth: A Measured Response” (both attempts to examine the philosophy and “science” of Flat Earth theorists) were trading spots with “Don’t Be a Lawyer.” I ventured over to Netflix when I finally got tired of nice British men explaining things to me (it took a while, I’ll admit) and found the documentary Behind the Curve, which follows a few of the top figures in the Flat Earth movement and attempts to humanize them (without condoning them). I also happened to be reading The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, and saw online articles about how Facebook moderators start to believe conspiracy theories, and watched testimony of an 18-year-old who defied his Anti-Vax mother. (I promise this all combines and makes sense in a second.) With these media influences tumbling in my head, and a very long road trip where even my audio books could not fully entertain me, my brain started to make connections. In a word—woah.
For basically the first time, I felt like I understood these two movements. Note that I did not believe either of these two theories; Flat Earth seems to be a “gateway drug” to other, more pernicious conspiracies and beliefs, including many beliefs that are racist, misogynist, transphobic, and anti-Semitic, and I don’t know if I have the time or the patience to explain all of the problems I have with the incredibly harmful Anti-Vax movement. The fact that Jenny McCarthy is on a TV show where she tries to guess what celebrity is singing inside of a costume, instead of facing a class-action lawsuit for all the harm she’s done, fills me with a rage so strong that I can only describe it as “fire-hate.”
But I think it’s worth pointing out that emphasizing all of studies in the world proving that vaccinations are safe and…. well… the 2000 years of established science that prove that the Earth is round…. seems to amount to diddly-squared-by-squat when it comes to trying to convince someone who is in the Anti-Vax or Flat Earth movements. I also haven’t managed to solve anything by staring at these people with my eyebrows raised and just muttering “why?” under my breath repeatedly. So to borrow a technique from Contrapoints, I think it’s time for me to try to meet these people where they live, and figure out what led them to this point. The best defense is not offense, it is prevention. And if we can figure out why this happens, then maybe we can prevent it from happening.
Cause 1: A
Not-Unreasonable Fear and Distrust of Authority
When I say the words “medical experimentation,” you probably
think of Nazis, or science fiction. But you don’t have to go that far in order
to find horrific cases of medical experimentation, non-consensual medical
procedures, and even just medical mistreatment.
The story of Henrietta Lacks, and of her family, is basically a case study in Doctors Not Giving Two Shits About Patient Consent. Whether it involved the taking of Henrietta’s cells, the failure to inform her family of the theft, the continued sampling of Lacks relatives in order to test them without clearly explaining what was going on, a failure to inform the Lacks family before Henrietta’s identity was revealed to the world, a failure to allow the Lacks family to receive any compensation from the repeated sale of Henrietta’s cells, the mistreatment of Henrietta’s daughter Elsie in a government institution…. It’s just… all bad.
Just… Google the phrase “icepick lobotomy.” Then think about the fact that one of the youngest patients to undergo one was 12. Then try to stop shuddering.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study started in 1932. Penicillin was discovered to be an effective treatment for syphilis in 1947. The study ended in 1972. (That’s about five years before the first Star Wars movie came out.) The men involved in the study were never told they had syphilis, never given penicillin, and actively prevented from accessing treatment elsewhere. The experiment only ended after 40 years because of whistleblowers.
The “father of gynecology,” James Marion Sims, developed most of his techniques by experimenting on slave women without the benefit of anesthesia.
Canadian doctors were performing forced or coerced sterilization procedures on indigenous women up until the far-distant year of… 2017. (writer’s note: Are you effing kidding me?)
And that’s not even taking into account more modern problems
with medical science, ranging from the fact that the opioid crisis was driven
by an unethical drug company owned by a single, reclusive family, to the fact
that the prices of life saving drugs are going up by as much as 4000 percent,
to the fact that all women, even famous, wealthy women like Selma Blair and
Serena Williams, face years of pain and even near death because medical
professionals don’t take their pain or experiences seriously.
Long story short, there are a lot of very good reasons to doubt the healthcare industry’s beliefs and practices, and to lack faith in their good intentions. The history of medical advancement is also a history of victimization, and the close relationship between healthcare and profit means that pretty much every patient has reason to believe that their doctor is not always acting in their best interests. It’s not completely unreasonable for patients, especially women and people of color, to distrust what the medical establishment calls “common practice.”
This story of exploitation, secrecy, and self-interest can be copy-and-pasted onto basically any authority that Flat Earthers believe contributes to the giant scam that is the “conspiracy” of the round earth, from the government, to religions, to scientific institutions, to major corporations. And we do, in fact, live in a world where high-ranking people are out to get us—or at least out to get our money and our allegiance. Those of us who are in the US are living under the official or unofficial rule of oligarchs and autocrats. They may not always be actively malicious, but they also wouldn’t exert themselves to extinguish the flames if we were on fire.
Cause 2: They Were
Taught to Question Everything…. And Not Really How to Stop
One of the most telling moments in the Behind the Curve documentary is when one of the filmmakers asks a Flat Earther what authority or evidence she is willing to believe. Her immediate answer is “Myself.” And that is it. (Though it’s also kind-of a lie, since about five minutes earlier in the film she was showing off her collection of Flat Earth theory books. See my dedication to truthiness? I let you know things even when it kinda spoils my point.) Basically every generation since the baby boomers has been told with increasing frequency that we should distrust the world around us, constantly question the motives of people giving us information, and “do our own research” to figure out what is what.
Oliver Thorn of Philosophy Tube explains that many Flat Earthers are practicing something similar to what’s known as Direct Realism—we perceive the world, and what we perceive is the best evidence of what the world is. Obviously this runs into problems, when our perceptions have limitations, are subject to illusions, or are even warped by our biases. But only trusting ourselves also doesn’t seem like the worst option in the current media climate. We have fake news and “fake news,” foreign countries interfering, memes and jokes turning into viral scares (if one of you shares that fucking Momo thing one more time, I swear to God…) one of our most trusted sources of information is a website that literally anyone can edit, the best news and information is hidden behind paywalls, pay-to-play journals will publish pretty much any nonsense, and Google makes it possible to find something that backs up your opinion, no matter what your opinion is. How, exactly, are we meant to find “objective” truth? Obviously I believe there is such a thing—climate change is real, herd immunity is important, the Earth IS in fact round—but I can see how someone would quickly become overwhelmed, and decide that only their own beliefs can be trusted. When you’re taught to doubt everything…. when exactly are you supposed to stop doubting?
Anti-Intellectualism Plus Anti-Authoritarianism Equals Ugh
Raise your hand if you’ve heard any of the following: Ivory
tower. Drain the Swamp. Those who can’t, teach. You can’t teach common sense.
For some good reasons and some very not good reasons, we’ve
kinda grown to hate smart people. They’re elitist, they’re out of touch, etc.
etc. Yeah, Hillary Clinton has tons of foreign policy experience, but is she likeable? Yeah, that astrophysicist is
really smart, but will they crack jokes with John Oliver? Probably the only
person we hate more than an authority figure is an authority figure who is an egghead. So when the people who are best
suited to disabuse you of your theories have “MD” or “PhD” after their name AND
are part of “The Establishment,” most people don’t have very strong instincts
to trust them, let alone get warm fuzzies to hear them talk.
Cause 4: We Lack
Media Literacy and Science Literacy
Any teacher who has ever had to explain to a student why they can’t cite a random blog in a paper will tell you that we have a serious problem in the US with media literacy, partly as an extension of the problem described above. We don’t do a great job of teaching people to separate fact from fiction, and our media itself is not really helping matters. If Fox News is proclaiming itself “Fair and Balanced,” “native advertising” means that advertisements can resemble news, and news agencies themselves often can’t be bothered to fact check, then proponents of media literacy face an uphill battle.
The same is true for science literacy. Our education system is…. not great. We can’t even decide if we should be teaching evolution and sex ed, let alone talking about neurodiversity and explaining the physics of the Earth. Hell, a lot of people still think that Columbus “discovered” that the Earth was round, even though people had known for hundreds of years (or longer) that the Earth was round, and even Columbus knew the Earth wasn’t flat. (He had a lot of other weird ideas about the Earth, but flatness wasn’t one of them.) Arthur C. Clarke said that an advanced enough level of science would resemble magic, and between AIs and gene editing, we’re basically at that point. People are taught to think that science is “scary” and above them. And as humans, we’re pretty good at hating what we fear, and going “oh yeah? Well uh, fuck you!” to anything that is seen as above us. So if people are sifting through likely-incorrect information about stuff they don’t understand anyway, then the chances that they are going to come away with a false conclusion is pretty high.
This lack of science literacy also doubles as a lack of
medical literacy. We have serious stigmas about people on the autism spectrum,
to the point that in the hypothetical (and false) dichotomy between “autism”
and “measles,” a lot of parents are leaning towards “measles.” And that’s
partly because we don’t understand
measles. Most of us haven’t seen them in person. Or tetanus, or meningitis, or
any of the things that we have vaccines for. Name one person besides FDR that
you know of who had polio. And if, as we discussed above, “my own personal
experience and knowledge” is the only source that people trust, then
vaccine-preventable diseases seem far away and unimportant.
Cause 5: On the Other Hand, They’re Not Actually Totally Ignoring Evidence
This one seems a little counter-intuitive. But one weird
connection between Anti-Vaxxers and Flat Earthers is that they are actually
both heavily invested in the concept of science. They’re just not using it in
ways that are entirely correct, or that we would approve of. Anti-Vaxxers tend
to rely on anecdotal evidence—“true” stories of children that were hurt or
killed by vaccines. Flat Earthers turn to YouTube videos and self-designed
experiments that “prove” the Earth is flat.
You will meet few people who are more dedicated to
“research” than an Anti-Vaxxer who is determined to prove that vaccines are
dangerous. They’ll join multiple message boards, start Facebook groups, look up
the chemicals inside of vaccines (true story, I know the amount of mercury in
vaccines is not dangerous, but I also didn’t even know that some vaccines had mercury in them until Anti-Vaxxers
became a thing). They collect reams of “evidence” that vaccines are harmful,
and can spit arguments at you on command.
The most endearing-yet-sad figures from the Behind the Curve documentary are two men
who do multiple experiments in an attempt to prove the Earth is flat. Their
experiments are actually interesting and fairly well-reasoned. But since
they’re performing a twisted form of the Scientific Method (starting with an
answer and then looking for proof via experiments, rather than starting with a
question and using experiments to find an answer) the experiments are also
doomed to fail, for these men’s definition of fail. At least two of the
experiments that they design do, in fact, show that the Earth is round. They
then have to scramble to find ways to dismiss their own results, or to “prove”
that their original experiments were actually performed incorrectly.
Cause 6: They’ve Found a Community, and Are Terrified to Leave It
So what could cause two grown men to become so nervous that they would rather argue that they are idiots than to argue that their experiments were correct? Why, the fear of social ostracization, of course!
By the time someone reaches the point that they are a hardcore Flat Earther or an Anti-Vaxxer, they have done a lot to alienate their pre-existing family and friends (or never really had a strong social safety net to start with). Behind the Curve emphasizes how most of the people in the Flat Earth community find companionship and acceptance in one another, and how little connection they still have to the outside world. Most of them have been rejected by family and friends, some of them have even had spouses leave them over their beliefs. And… well you can see why. I’m a pretty patient person (I’ve repeatedly stood at parties and nodded while repeating “uh huh” in a perky voice while a guy with worse grades than me tried to explain my major to me) but I’m pretty sure that if I had a close friend who was a Flat Earther, there would be a point that I could no longer bear to hang out with them because the conversation kept turning to a mysterious “they” who wanted us to think the Earth was flat for… reasons. And I just genuinely don’t think that I could hang out with an Anti-Vaxxer—I would be afraid of carrying an illness either to or from their unvaccinated child, and I would probably be constantly tempted to deliver lectures that heavily featured the words “immuno-compromised” and “fuck.”
So the Flat Earthers and Anti-Vaxxers, somewhat naturally,
pull even closer to their own in-group. Their fellow conspiracy theorists are
the only ones that “get” them. And the internet makes it possible to form close
connections with people even if you never get to see them in person—you could
be the only Flat‑Earther in Wyoming (I promise you there is more than one
Flat-Earther in Wyoming) but as long as you had the internet, you could still
reject your real-life social interactions in favor of the warm, weird embrace
of online conspiracy theorists.
But if your entire social circle is made up of people whose major connecting thread is belief in the same fringe theory, it suddenly becomes very, very difficult to stop believing in the theory. It’s a lower-stakes version of what happens to people who leave the white nationalist movement. All of your white nationalist friends no longer want to associate with you, because you no longer believe that white people are The Best. But none of your pre-white nationalism friends want to spend time with you any more either because… well… you were a fucking Nazi for a while. And as anyone over the age of 20 who has moved to a new city can tell you, making new friends as an adult is HARD. The longer someone spends time embedded in these movements, the harder it becomes to leave them.
Cause 7. The World Is Scary, And We Want to Think We Can Explain It
The Laws of Thermodynamics dictate that the universe trends
towards entropy. And that is a really, really difficult thing for our “chimpanzees
on Four Loko” brains to handle. Our minds demand patterns, even when none
exist. If the roulette wheel has stopped on red five times in a row, we’ll bet
it all on black because it “has” to finally stop there, even though it still
only has a 50/50 chance. We’re dismayed when our earphones are tangled as we
pull them out of our pockets, even though there is only a 1 in (insert very
high number that Elle did not look up because she is not getting paid for this
stuff) chance that our headphones would emerge not tangled. We crave control. And in a weird way, conspiracy
theories are all about control. Just not necessarily our control.
It’s helpful (for me at least) to compare most conspiracy
theories to 9/11 conspiracy theories. I became an adult in the post-9/11 era,
and a lot of people around me from my teenage years on would dabble in the
occasional 9/11 theory, mostly revolving around the idea of a “false flag”
attack where Bush and Cheney attacked their own people in order to pad the
pockets of their corporate friends and bloat the military budget.
Under this theory of 9/11, the government is competent, cunning, ruthless, and coordinated, like an Ocean’s 35682 heist team. They’re capable of planting explosives in a building, hiring fake terrorists, hijacking planes, coordinating the response, framing foreign nationals, keeping a gigantic secret, etc. etc. And even though this version of our government is horrific, implying that they are capable of actively murdering planes and buildings-full of their own people (as opposed to the way that they normally passively kill their people by passing bills that deprive people of rights and resources) it’s also kinda…. comforting. Because it means that someone was in charge. Someone was pulling all the strings. Someone was keeping this from being random.
For a lot of people, the actually-horrifying option is the truth: that we were victims of a terrorist attack that we were woefully unprepared for. That our foreign policy has gained us enemies, that our attempts to mix liberty and security leave gigantic holes, that our leaders were a half-assed cowboy with Daddy Issues and a nasty troll man that my state is STILL apologizing for, and they were opportunists and capitalists and took advantage of the situation after tragedy had already occurred. The truth is that this happened because the world is chaotic and uncontrolled, and something on that scale can honestly probably happen again. Whenever. Wherever. Because seven point five billion people = chaos.
Flat Earthers have a hard time explaining WHY a shadow group
of intellectuals and officials, an undisclosed “they,” would bother creating
this elaborate myth that the Earth is round when it is really not. The best
they usually manage is that this delusional belief is part of a vast web of
conspiracies, and in its own way serves as a gateway drug to the sheeple—after
all, what better way to test the gullibility of a populace than to mislead them
about the shape of their home, the construction of their literal universe? But
for many Flat Earthers, WHY someone would do this is not as important as the
fact THAT someone is doing this. There is a shadow organization that is so
powerful, it can mislead billions of
people. It can dictate science, and education, and the space program, and our
concepts of time and direction. It can mislead people about airline flights,
photography, even gravity. Though they might have nefarious intentions, someone is behind the wheel of all of
our major institutions.
You see the same thing with Anti-Vaxxers, who also have a hard time explaining why, exactly, anyone would be purposefully poisoning children with vaccines. (As opposed to purposefully poisoning children with lead-contaminated water…. Goddamnit we live in a pretty terrible society.) They usually point to a conspiracy involving Big Pharma and government control—Big Pharma actually wants us to get sick, so that we have to buy their medicine. The government wants children to “develop” neurodiversity because… something something, sheeple. And again, Anti-Vaxxers want this to happen because to them, the alternative is scarier: things can happen to their children that are outside of their control, and outside of their understanding. They see the commercials about the rates of autism going up, and think it is because autism itself is increasing, and not just our ability to correctly diagnose it. They would rather think that it is a new development than just something that has always been there but that we’ve been shitty about noticing. They see a timing link between vaccinations and the appearance of autism characteristics, and think that the vaccines cause autism, because they’d rather think doctors are purposefully altering children than to realize that their child is not necessarily going to grow into the type of child they always pictured (a neurotypical child) even though they’ve been keeping pace with their peers in their development to this point. They feel (wrongly) that they’ve been a victim of a bait-and-switch, that some evil entity pulled a “changeling” situation on them and left them with a child that is different from the one they had originally. They have a hard time accepting that no… this is just their kid, and their kid always had autism, and they shouldn’t love them any less. And also, maybe they should campaign to end stigmas against neurodiversity, instead of campaigns that let their kids get exposed to measles. You know. Just a thought.
So Uh…. Why Have You
Babbled About All of This, Elle?
So. Wow. Okay, so if you’ve stayed with me thus far… well first of all you have far too much patience, but I appreciate you. Second of all, I promise this is all coming to a point. And the point is: I think we can fix this. Maybe not immediately (definitely not immediately) but we can address most of these causes with corresponding solutions.
Solution 1: Make
Institutions… Suck Less?
So we’re starting out with one of the bigger and less-possible solutions right out of the gate. But one of the most obvious solutions is to make major organizations, especially the medical industry and the government, just… suck less. Make them less imposing, and less scary. Increase their transparency and their accountability. If we lived in a world where the medical community had a vested interest in us not being sick, as opposed to the current situation where “the longer we are sick the more money we will give them,” that would go a long way in disputing notions that pharmaceutical companies are getting us sick on purpose. If every branch of the medical community treated the Hippocratic Oath as if it were a law, instead of a wishy-washy guideline, more people would be able to believe in their good intentions.
If the scientific community was better at communicating and
explaining things, instead of just dismissing anyone who can’t keep up with
them, it would also help rehab their image. The same with the government—increased
transparency about intentions, spending, etc. would dismiss a lot of fears that
all of this was happening for murky reasons that involve fooling us.
Solution 2: While We’re
at it, Increase Media Transparency
There should be consequences for knowingly spreading misinformation.
There should be a strict division between “news” and “advertising.” There
should be a sense of community responsibility to fund ethical, as-objective-as-possible
journalism. Organizations and people that knowingly spread harmful
misinformation should be de-platformed from social media and sites like YouTube.
If we’re going to ask people to trust sources outside of themselves, we have to
make sources outside of themselves trustworthy.
Solution 3: Make it Cool
to be Smart, and Make Smart People Act Better
Why do we televise sports drafts, but we don’t televise
university hires or research lab head hunting? Why aren’t there journalists
breathlessly covering the action at the Modern Language Association
conferences? Why do we act as if intelligence is purely inherent, instead of a
developable skill like talent at painting or writing? Why do we make so many
intelligent characters into alien-like assholes or chip-on-their-shoulder
jerks? Why do we perpetuate the idea that academia is an ivory tower by making it an ivory tower. (True facts, I
once saw Salman Rushdie get accused of living in an ivory tower and his
pearl-clutching “Well I never!” response is what I think about whenever I hear
some top-tier academic try to unconvincingly insist that that they are not
disconnected from the common people.) We need to make intelligence accessible,
interesting, and cool.
“The smartest guy in the room” trope is seen as negative
because in most of our experiences, the smartest guy in the room will let you
know, in excruciating detail, that he
is the smartest guy in the room. We need to admire intelligence, but not
idolize it. We need to share our knowledge, but not be paternalistic or condescending.
Intelligence needs to be a tool, not a weapon. Anyone who has learned a cool
fact and then excitedly shared it with a friend knows how good it feels to share knowledge in a helpful, enthusiastic way.
Even when that knowledge is about bad stuff, sharing it with the intention to
improve instead of destroy makes the act feel a lot less ill-intentioned. It
may have made for a more boring show, but if Dr. House spent more time saying “You
know that’s an interesting theory, let’s see how it compares against the data”
instead of “You’re a moron,” then we probably would have gotten a better
picture of the medical establishment.
Solution 4: Can We
Please Fix Education for Goodness Sake?
No two ways about it, we need to do better with education.
That means better funding (and not just redline-influenced property tax funding
that ensures that white wealthy children get white wealthy schools, and children
of color get textbooks that still say we have 48 states and call the Civil War “The
War of Northern Aggression.”) We need to have better, less-partisan control
over what makes it into textbooks. We need to start teaching children how to
research and parse data from an even earlier age. We need smaller class sizes,
more teachers with less burnout, better funding, and better resources. We need
to stop stigmatizing neurodiversity, stop making science seem scary, and stop
relying on simplistic, incorrect understandings of the world and of history.
Solution 5: We Need to Stop Writing Off Anti-Vaxxers and Flat Earthers as if They Are Lost Causes, and Convince Them to Use Their Powers for Good
Be honest—if someone tells you that you are wrong, even when
you are wrong, how likely are you to
take that in good faith and adjust your behavior? How long does it take you to unruffle
your feathers? How likely are you to double down on your wrong beliefs, because
fuck you that’s why? Why do we act as if Anti-Vaxxers or Flat Earthers are some
magical other species that will respond differently?
None of us like to be made to feel ignorant, even if we are being ignorant. And none of us like to be dismissed. So even though it is painful, and unfair, we have to be open to the idea of taking these people seriously. Not taking their ideas seriously—we don’t need an Anti-Vaxxer on a panel with a doctor, or a Flat Earther on a panel with an astrophysicist the way that we have panels with climate scientists and total randos who think that climate change isn’t real because they can make a snowball—but taking them seriously, as people who are capable of growth and change. Talk to them about their fears and concerns. What led them to feel this way? What types of evidence would they need to change their minds? Find a point of common scientific belief (the sky is blue, cars burn fuel, whatever) and work backwards from there to show how the same process that can prove that belief can disprove their own beliefs. Tell them that you admire their dedication to discovering truth and that you acknowledge that there are problems in this world, but that you’d like to see their skills put to better use.
Solution 6: …..Um…..
I’ll admit, this one is hard for me. I think that being
asked to stay friends with someone who is psychologically or physically harmful
is asking someone to participate in abuse. On a purely herd-immunity level, I
think that Anti-Vaxxers and their unvaccinated children shouldn’t really be
around… well, anyone. But I can also see how leaving these groups of people in
total isolation is not actually helping the situation, unless we are actively
hoping that Ant-Vaxxers and their unvaccinated-but-innocent children actually
die out, which is just too gruesome to bear thinking about.
I don’t really know what to do. I think that one option is
to try, in the safest way possible, to let people in these groups know that you
will be there for them if they manage to walk away from these beliefs. I don’t
have any Anti-Vaxxer friends (I don’t think…) but if I did, and if they saw the
error of their ways and wanted to be friends again, I like to think that I
would easily, if a bit warily, accept them back into the fold.
Solution 7: Solve the
Things We Can Actually Solve, Otherwise, Embrace the Suck
Hbomberguy points out that Flat Earthers are not wrong when they believe that things in the world are wrong. We’re in what’s commonly referred to as “late stage” capitalism, and the world is literally and metaphorically on fire. As I suggest in Solution 1, there are some things we can do to make this be less the case. But… well we can’t fix all of it. And to a certain point, we have to try to get to a point where we are okay with uncertainty. We can control a certain number of things to try and make things safer and more secure, but then we have to just keep existing in this world. Earphones are going to get tangled. The roulette wheel is going to land on red for a sixth time, and it’s going to seem really wrong. We have to find a way to accept that some things will be forever outside of our personal control, and even outside of our collective control. Not to say that we should stop fighting to make things better, but to say that sometimes we just have to acknowledge that entropy exists.
So…. This is what has been haunting my brain for the last couple of weeks. I guess now it can haunt yours. In a weird way, it has made me hopeful—up until this point, I admittedly thought that “reaching” Anti-Vaxxers and Flat Earthers was a pipe dream. As two of the groups who seem to most vehemently reject reality and science, I was afraid they were a lost cause. And now I know they are not.
That, at least, gives us a chance.
Signed: Feminist Fury
Featured image is six views of the Earth from space, taken from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s Flickr account. They’re in the public domain because our tax dollars paid for them.